On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 11:43 +0200, Molle Bestefich wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
Not to be harsh, but:
Hehe ;-).
I know, I was just poking, hoping to get an explanation for why James' particular app might be more beneficial than Process Explorer.
(yes, I like Process Explorer, I use it for debugging from time to time.)
The optimal thing of course would be to have everything working...
Hi,
as I was the one introducing it, I thought I had a second look. I just came back from a short holiday did a 'git pull' tested it with the 'ERROR_SUCCESS in every case' and Process Explorer didn't crash !!!
I did some (positive) regression testing and found that patch:
13163349521e50e7039e188a22b6a814dcfcfc37 is first bad commit commit 13163349521e50e7039e188a22b6a814dcfcfc37 Author: Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org Date: Fri Jul 21 11:53:24 2006 +0200
ntdll: Add a few more free list entries to the heap.
is actually responsible for making things work with ERROR_SUCCESS as the default.
Can anybody (Alexandre?) explain why?
Cheers,
Paul.