Wow! Only 2 years later? Between my first attempt of introducing ARRAY_SIZE() with an "I'm not convinced" reply and my standardization of the different ARRAY_SIZE() that others introduced it took 5+ years.
Wine is just not for visionaries... /me laughs
You seem to have an interest in compiler development and some of the advanced warnings turn out to be not that helpful. So there is a reluctance to add workarounds for those. Once they make it even to Debian then they became a problem so a fix is more likely to get in even though it is "ugly".
bye michael
On 11/22/20 5:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
This patch of mine in 2018 received a note from Nikolay
"I think we should try instead to use more predictable paths. This change scatters magic increments, that looks worse than a warning in my opinion."
as it's only response. It was not applied.
Nearly to the day two years later pretty exactly the same patch got applied, from a different author: