Author: Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com Date: Tue Mar 21 17:31:20 2017 +0300
comctl32/taskdialog: Initial implementation of a minimal task dialog.
Based on patches by Fabian Maurer.
Thanks for taking the time to rework it, really appreciate it! However, there's a few questions I'd like to ask.
static const WCHAR nulW;
Shouldn't this be set 0?
if (radio_button) *radio_button = taskconfig->nDefaultButton;
This probably should have been changed, it was already wrong in the old implementation.
/* write control entries */ LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY_SAFE(control, control2, &desc.controls, struct
taskdialog_control, entry)
{ ALIGN_POINTER(ptr, 3);
template_write_data(&ptr, control->template, control->template_size); /* list item won't be needed later */ list_remove(&control->entry); Free(control->template); Free(control);
}
Wouldn't it be shorter to also use "taskdialog_clear_controls" here? Just curious on why you chose to write it again.
Also, wouldn't it make sense to keep the template generating code separated from the taskdialog specific bits? I intentionally split it, so we could use those function in another place, if needed. In my opinion, that also makes the code easier readable.
Finally, are you adding the rest from my latest patch-set too, or should I adapt the missing parts?
Regards, Fabian Maurer