Dan Kegel wrote:
jwhite wrote:
The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case. Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks?
I like it.
I would also like to see us get a lot tougher about letting people build wine without a full complement of development headers. Maybe our configure should have a sanity check at the end, and abort if something optional but very common is missing; we could add a --no-sanity-check option to enable configuring in that case if it's really intended.
- Dan
IMHO configure should abort if any of the required libraries are missing and '--without-<bar>' flag was not given. Pretty much anything that prints out warning if it was not found.
Hopefully this will prevent broken builds and invalid bug/problem reports.
Vitaliy.