Re: netapi32: implement NetServerEnum and NetShareEnum

[Alexandre Julliard]

Juan Lang  writes:
> Yeah, that's why I emailed the list twice before
> asking how to go about it.  Is making a static SMB
> library preferrable?  I haven't yet discovered the
> interface MS uses to SMB (public or private), so I
> haven't been able to hide it in the real place.

As I said already, IMO the file I/O stuff should go in the kernel. The
current approach is broken, as you noted in your FIXMEs.
> As far as not building properly, umm.. it builds and
> runs for me.  You think one dll might link stale .o's,
> or??

Yes it breaks parallel makes.