Mike Hearn mh@codeweavers.com writes:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:19:27 +0900, Mike McCormack wrote:
How about creating a new object class or interface to an existing object that exposes these interfaces? That way you won't need to export any extra functions from shell32.
What's wrong with additional APIs? The browse folder API isn't COM based anyway.
Well, there's an IShellFolder interface, and it should probably be doing something with that. In any case it should definitely be more integrated into the shell way of doing things, there shouldn't be a need for a whole new set of APIs. This needs more thought IMO...