31 Dec
2003
31 Dec
'03
5:48 p.m.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" dpaun@rogers.com writes:
On December 31, 2003 04:38 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
they were/are protected, but I think it should be removed from winegcc because they don't do the Job.
Maybe, I'm not sure. I'll let Alexandre comment on the ms-extensions.h idea. In general, he does not like non-standard headers...
No, I don't. Boaz, could you please explain a bit more why the definitions in winegcc don't work for you?
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.com