jchevrier@nexicom.net wrote:
Yeah, you can't go wrong there (adding a trace after the call). I am more interested in finding out why a call isn't implemented in one copy of Windows 98SE but is in another. Currently in the tests a fair number are executed without checking for an error code. This is due to the assumption that they are implemented on all recent versions of Windows (95, 98, NT, 2000, etc). Finding calls here and there not being implemented on versions of Windows that should have them throws a wrench into that. We should probably just check the error code on all calls (whether they're expected to pass on all platforms or not).
Justin
If time permits (or if you beat me to it) I will create a patch that adds a check after each call. That way we can be sure we show actual info.
Cheers,
Paul.