On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 03:33:12PM -0400, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
I certainly agree that wine-devel should be the main communication medium for obvious reasons. However, the latency on the list is rather large lately (both from an email delivery perspective, as well as a psihological one). Having more of a conversation where the latency is a few seconds allows for a different style of discussion, where one can bring up small ideas that are maybe not worth a thread on wine-devel.
The result of such a meeting should be nicely summarized and posted on wine-devel and WineHQ.
I think we should give it a try.
I second that.
IMHO we should have our monthly "architectural meeting" and have some volunteer go through the log and add the relevant content to the Wine architecture page -- wait, which page again?? ;)
At least we should try to have a more focussed and detailed development. For some central issues, nobody knows where exactly we're going (or at most one person ;)
You can sign me up for these meetings...
Andi