Re: kernel32/tests: remove win9x hacks (try 2)

[James McKenzie]

On 2/25/11 10:33 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Saulius Krasuckas  writes:
> > Thanks.  Do you mean something like integrating OpenWatcom C compiler
> > optionally into dlls/*/tests?
> >
> > And then running 16-bit part of winetest on Win3.1?  WinXP seems to be
> > broken in my case.  While Win98 seems OK.
>
> No, winetest would run on XP. If your app doesn't work on XP then it's
> unlikely to work on Wine. We are *not* going to replicate the Win95
> 16-bit architecture.

I've been looking at the use of is_win9x and all the tests do for 
riched20 (except one) is check for the presence of UNICODE calls, namely 
lstrcmpW.  I would like to rename the variable and redo the test.  Is 
this acceptable or should the test itself be dropped?

James McKenzie