Re: [try2] kernel32: Add partial stub for NeedCurrentDirectoryForExePath - what's wrong?

[Kirill K. Smirnov]

> > For containing backshash. Yes, comment must be better.
>
> A comment that states you're looking for a backslash is superfluous;
> the code makes that obvious.  A better comment would be 'check for
> filename only' or something along those lines.

Maybe, 'MSDN claims that if filename contains backshash then return value is 
always TRUE'?
> How do you know that's 
> what this function does if you haven't tested it?

I've mentioned an MSDN article in the patch. There are some glimpses what this 
function does. Easy, isn't it? ;-)

That MSDN article is rather strange: it claims, that filename is the name of 
executable file, but in wine traces of cmd.exe I can see '.' (dot) as an 
argument.

--
Kirill