8 Dec
2007
8 Dec
'07
2:14 p.m.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
The only patch I can think of that avoid *both* warnings is the one below. Not perfect, but I fair compromise. What do you think? Or do you have any better idea that we might want to try?
For the record, your fix that you committed yesterday certainly looks simpler. A few cycles longer, but that isn't a performance critical path.
Gerald