Re: export variables in dlls

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On 18 Aug 2003, Martin Wilck wrote:
> I am not sure what manipulations you're talking about;

Look at winegcc.c. If we do that one in C, it just makes sense
to do winewrap in C as well. Plus it's more extensible for the
future, me thinks.
> AFAICS the hard
> stuff is done by winebuild anyway. What I don't like about C in this
> case is that all the low-level stuff (realloc() and friends) makes the
> code hard to read and prone to buffer overflows and the like.

There is a patch pending which removes most of that. Not a biggy, really.
> Yeah, the wine guys like low-level coding :-)
> Perhaps I'll contribute a bash version of winewrap soon, just for fun.

Try doing winegcc in standard sh, I doubt you'll get any shorter/cleaner
code. Not to mention a bit slower :)