Re: secur32: Fix a failing test in win95

[James Hawkins]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Paul Vriens  wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM, James Hawkins
>  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Changelog:
> > - Fix a failing test in win95.
> >
> > dlls/secur32/tests/main.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > James Hawkins
>
> But if the result is SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION it's not broken is it?

Do you think returning SEC_E_UNSUPPORTED_FUNCTION is acceptable
behavior for Wine?
> Shouldn't we use some kind of skip here? (The end result will be the
> same, as we should use win_skip, it just doesn't look correct).

There's really no point.