Re: #pre5 - comdlg32 MS_VC + PSDK porting

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dimitrie O. Paun"  writes:
> In other words, by now most people have upgraded from 2.95.x.
> Apparently Dave Miller claims 2.95.x is still desirable on
> Sparc, but that's not that interesting for us. On the other
> hand, being able to compile Wine with the PSDK brings real
> value.

I frankly think that being portable to various Unix compilers is of
more value than building with the PSDK headers. I have nothing against
adding hacks to enable both, but killing our Unix portability to
support MSVC headers is not a good idea.