Tony Lambregts tony_lambregts@telusplanet.net writes:
Actually Alexandre hasn't commented on it, so if it doesn't bit rot it still could be commited. However, at the time, there were some negative comments about it. It seems that the major concern is that it should do more than it does.
Well, yes, if we really need to change the fstype it should be a generic option that allows all types to be specified, not just NTFS. And it shouldn't overload the existing "type" parameter, it should be a separate entry. But it may be enough to simply always return FAT32, if that works for the app in question. Returning NTFS is a bit misleading anyway since we don't implement any of the NTFS-specific features.