4 Mar
2009
4 Mar
'09
5:45 p.m.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net writes:
so - what do people think? would you agree that a user-space pipe "proxy" is an effective solution?
No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and it doesn't help anything since the wineserver constraints that you are trying to avoid obviously apply just as well to your proxy process.
how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes?