Re: [PATCH 2/4] ucrtbase: Add __std_type_info_name implementation

[Piotr Caban]

On 08/04/16 18:56, Sebastian Lackner wrote:
> Its up to you of course, but why not CONTAINING_RECORD in those two cases?

I could have used CONTAINING_RECORD. Since the patch is already 
committed I don't think it's worth changing.

Thanks,
Piotr