Re: poll vs. epoll

[Dan Kegel]

Mike Hearn wrote:
> > That's fine, except that compiling your library on a machine that has 
> > epoll, and then trying to run it on a machine without will not work. 
> > It will not load if runtime glibc doesn't have epoll. I'm using 
> > "syscall" to work around that problem in wine.
>
> Why not use dlopen?

Maybe he's referring to the case where libc.so doesn't have
the epoll bindings, but the underlying kernel does?
- Dan