Re: Public domain source in wine

[Alexandre Julliard]

Michael Jung  writes:
> - A more technical question: LibTomCrypt's original sources are highly
>
> customizable (A lot of conditional compilation and hook-functions). Since we 
> have fairly special requirements for rsaenh, I could cut down the source code 
> a lot. However, this would make it harder to incorporate code from a newer 
> version of libtomcrypt, once it becomes available. Which way is preferable? 
> Having less code or beeing easily upgradeable?

In general having less code is preferable, assuming it's not just a
few percent less. In particular getting rid of #ifdefs is strongly
encouraged.