Re: ntdll / kernel32: #52

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Eric Pouech"  wrote:
> > Rtl* functions should generally avoid doing server calls. You should 
> > implement the Rtl* functions on top of the Nt* functions, not the other 
> > way around.
>
> the "real" fix would mean (which I decided not to implement)
> - not moving local atom tables to wineserver (and handling them in the local memory)
> - that would by the way allow to use the internal representation of local atom
>
> tables
> - then, just Nt atom related functions would call wineserver

Moving local atom support to wineserver makes it also a lot slower,
and that's not acceptable IMO.