Vincent Povirk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jacek Caban jacek@codeweavers.com wrote:
I also don't see much point in winelib builds so I don't plan to work on it myself. It will make things harder to support. The only real point I can see is if we wanted to provide a package for architectures are not supported by PE. Anyway, once mingw builds will work good, it should be much easier to change.
For me, the point would be that a lot of build dependencies could be eliminated, once the other tools have generally-available fixes, and then maybe more people could build gecko as part of the normal process.
Or is this not true?
It is true, but it will lead to a lot of different problems. We may rethink it when we'll get at least near to the point where it won't be a theoretical discussion.
Jacek