On Monday 28 July 2008 19:09:03 you wrote:
Victor ErV2005@rambler.ru writes:
Well, the last attempt (with added big-endian support) was submitted several days ago, and again - no feedback, and patch still isn't accepted.
What's wrong with patch now?
The big endian support makes things worse than before. You need to use the proper data types so that you don't need any casts or #ifdefs.
I've changed things a bit and resubmitted patch. Now there will be less ifdefs. I'm not sure which "data types" are you talking about, since I'll need per-byte surface access in any case, and It doesn't look like it can be wrapped into endianness-independant datatype.