Tony Lambregts tony_lambregts@telusplanet.net writes:
Patches should be in diff -u format. Please refer to the following link about submitting patches.
Er... I didn't mean it to be submitted right now, only getting some comments on it (thanks!). But below is the patch nevertheless (the new listbox.c file is attached). Reading the devel list it also became obvious that there is wine-patches, where I should send the final patches, should I? So: is this kind of hackery acceptable for eventual inclusion? If nobody objects, I will go on improving it (I already did so) and occasionally send it to wine-patches. Hmm. What is that "patch Patch police"? :)
Feri.
Ps: If anybody wants to try, (s)he will probably need to apply this patch to Makefile instead (or run configure). That's why I included a note instead of a patch previously.
Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/user/tests/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 2 Oct 2002 19:58:28 -0000 1.3 +++ Makefile.in 4 Mar 2003 22:36:41 -0000 @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ CTESTS = \ class.c \ generated.c \ + listbox.c \ sysparams.c \ win.c \ wsprintf.c