Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
But i also guess that he likes to receive more patches than less. For the casual/new Wine patch submitter CVS is easier to use. If those submitters do more Wine work they will see the light anyway and migrate to git ;)
More patches are good, but if they are in a broken format they are not really useful. And CVS unfortunately makes it much too easy to submit broken patches, so it's not necessarily better for new submitters.
Are there any plans to get rid of CVS? I would guess keeping the CVS tree sync from the git tree is low maintanance so it can be kept around "forewever".
Yes, as long as it doesn't require any maintenance it will be kept around. But if it breaks for some reason, I'm not going to spend time fixing it.