It would be gr8 if you could check with MIDL and WIDL the output of msxml.idl
On 8/29/06, Dan Hipschman dsh@linux.ucla.edu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:45:17PM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
But when i see the generated header file. I see that there is the expansion of interfaces defined in the foo.idl if we include it in foobar.idl eg: foobar.idl #include "foo.idl"
For further reference see the msxml.idl in the PSDK headers. it includes xmldom.idl and xmldso.idl, but in the msxml.h we see all the declarations in xmldso.h and xmldom.h
I dont know they(M$) generate msxml.h from msxml.idl
I might not understand your question. If you don't want to #include the idl file, you could use 'import "foo.idl";' which will process the IDL file but just plop a #include "foo.h" in the generated header file. If that's not what you're looking for, maybe consider cpp_quote to copy code directly to the header. I don't have a windows machine with me at the moment to look at the PSDK files. I can take a look at them tomorrow and see how WIDL's output differs from MIDL's.