no problem any more with this code when I updated my CVS (aged from Tuesday morning :) ) black magic ;)
--- Lionel Ulmer lionel.ulmer@free.fr a écrit : > > trace:ddraw:Main_DirectDrawSurface_GetAttachedSurface
(0x402a9418)->Looking for caps: 4,0,1,1 output: 0x741ed0 Caps are : DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER trace:ddraw:Main_DirectDrawSurface_GetAttachedSurface Surface: (0x402a9b38) caps: 1000601c,0,0,0 Surface caps are : DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER DDSCAPS_COMPLEX
DDSCAPS_FLIP
DDSCAPS_3DDEVICE DDSCAPS_VIDEOMEMORY DDSCAPS_LOCALVIDMEM trace:ddraw:Main_DirectDrawSurface_GetAttachedSurface Returning
surface
0x402a9b38 with description :
- DDSD_CAPS : DDSCAPS_BACKBUFFER DDSCAPS_COMPLEX DDSCAPS_FLIP
DDSCAPS_3DDEVICE DDSCAPS_VIDEOMEMORY DDSCAPS_LOCALVIDMEM
- DDSD_HEIGHT : 480
- DDSD_WIDTH : 640
- DDSD_PITCH : 1280
- DDSD_LPSURFACE : 0x424b0000
- DDSD_PIXELFORMAT : ( DDPF_RGB , RGB bits: 16, R f800 G 07e0 B
001f)
Well, you completely lost me here... Could you restate your problem from the beginning ? Because well, in your trace, I see that you actually FOUND a valid attached surface. So the 'if (found == NULL)' test will be FALSE and thus whether this code is in or not would not change anything at all.
So I doubt that removing this piece of code would change anything in the application's behaviour.
The only thing I could see would be that you were running with a quite old CVS version and when you ugraded you got one fix I did on the GetAttachedSurface code to handle some problem we had with useless caps in the DDSCAPS structure being tested whereas they should not have been.
Lionel-- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/
===== Sylvain Petreolle spetreolle@users.sourceforge.net Fight against Spam ! http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html ICQ #170597259
"Don't think you are. Know you are." Morpheus, in "Matrix".
___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com