On Apr 23, 2013, at 2:45 AM, Sam Edwards wrote:
On 04/22/2013 07:08 PM, Ken Thomases wrote:
I can't speak to how Windows would render it, but one such font is Zapfino. It's an "exuberant" calligraphic font with lots of flourishes, some of which have strokes extending into the line above or below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapfino https://www.google.com/images?q=zapfino -Ken
I have never known about this font -- very stylistic indeed. :)
While there are plenty of strokes that go well above the cap height or below the baseline, the Win Ascent and Win Descent values (which are defined as yMax for all glyphs and -yMin for all glyphs, respectively) in the metric tables are valid - none of the glyphs violate these limits, so the patch doesn't affect this (correctly-formatted) font.
I loaded it up in Wine's Notepad, both with and without my patch, and took screenshots of the output: http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_unpatched.png http://cfsworks.com/files/images/screenshots/zapfino_wine_patched.png
Hmm. I assumed that ascent+descent+leading equals the distance between baselines. In a Mac-native text editor, the strokes of one line of Zapfino can extend into the lines above or below, which is why I figured they exceeded the ascent and descent values. Notepad doesn't let the lines get that close, though. So, something else must be going on. I guess this isn't relevant to the question at issue with your patch. Never mind. ;)
-Ken