Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
Lørdag 06 januar 2007 00:28, skrev Kari Hurtta:
Kari Hurtta hurtta+gmane@siilo.fmi.fi writes
in gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel:
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes alex@thehandofagony.com writes
in gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel:
Onsdag 03 januar 2007 21:46, skrev Kari Hurtta:
"Chris Morgan" chmorgan@gmail.com writes in
gmane.comp.emulators.wine.devel:
On 03 Jan 2007 16:34:21 +0200, Kari Hurtta hurtta+gmane@siilo.fmi.fi
wrote:
http://appdb.winehq.org/ platinium list's first item should point to that test instead.
Perhaps appdb should check that "Installs?" and "Runs?" column on particular test have "Yes", before it accept "Platinum" to "Rating" column ?
For test results? It already does that.
Now appdb.winehq.org seems not answer, but on that particular test there there was on Installs? -column NA (or something like that) and on Rating -column Platinum.
Look test results for http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=928&iTestingId=8285
There is N/A on Installs? -column
Yes, because the test results handler does not know whether this application has an installer. Unless this information is stored along with the version, we cannot prohibit the use of Installs? N/A.
We could have that I suppose. Then we have the issue of filling in the field with the correct value. That would be a monstrous janitorial job with over 5000 versions to look over. http://appdb.winehq.org/appdbStats.php
We could lessen the job if we applied some smart logic to it. If we looked at the existing test results and set "Has Installer" to "YES" if all the test results had a Yes or No in them and Set "Has Installer" to "No" if all the test results had N/A.
Even so what do we do about all the applications that have no test results.
Anyway this could be phased in if it is really going to be helpful.
--
Tony Lambregts