Re: const cleanup round 1

[Eric Pouech]

Mike Schaadt a écrit :
> after some extra testing I found that it's not that my modification
> would forbid that, but it would complain about the second parameter
> not being const(which I thought that the compiler would be fine with
> auto promoting the WCHAR ** to const WCHAR **).  Fair enoug then.
> Strike those modifications.  Should I resubmit without those? or
> should I put that off until I get a second round ready?

you'd better remove that part from the part, and resubmit the good part
A+