Re: vcomp: single-threaded implementation of _vcomp_fork (try 6)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dan Kegel  writes:
> I don't think he's saying that.
> It suffices that taking the address of the fourth parameter saves it
> to the stack.
> We are lucky in this case that there are already three
> non-varargs parameter, so after taking the address of the fourth
> parameter, all the varargs params are in memory.
> It all just happens to work (at least on ia32 and x64).

What I'm actually saying is that you should stop playing games with the
compiler and implement this in assembler, it's really not hard.