Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de writes:
That's how I planned it - but not in the first version. As I said, I planned to split everything into manageable sizes. I could add all possible tests in one huge patch, but there's no real benefit to that.
In short, I think the main problem here is that I want to split the implementation into multiple patches. I planned to add functionality one-by- one, covered with as many tests as I needed to give the code near full coverage. Is that a bad approach? If you want proof that the functionality can be added, please tell me how.
Splitting the implementation in multiple patches is definitely a good thing, but if you want meaningful reviews you'll have to show more than just the first step, otherwise we can't tell where you are going.