Qian Hong fracting@gmail.com writes:
IMO the best solution is to correctly implement RemoveFontResource() so Bug 8292 will be fixed, then we don't need to worry about the broken test in usp10, which is the original reason for this patch.
Would you like me send this patch which is still an improvement, or just leave the broken test there until RemoveFontResource is implement?
Either way we probably need to improve handling of font files being deleted unexpectedly. But it's certainly reasonable to implement RemoveFontResource first and then see what remains to be fixed.