Re: Is there a process for reviewing a bugzilla staffer?

[Chris Morgan]

> Rewriting:
>
> We can conclude that VM was distracted first by the mention of the ies4lin and
> second by attempts to attribute the problem to ies4lin, and that, because of
> these distractions, he was unable to assess properly the issue at hand. One
> also concludes that VM over-relied on the features of the development process
> automation (bugzilla) and this this was also causel to tine incident since
> data available from bugzilla effectively masked the real problem.

I also wanted to mention that ies4lin SHOULD be a distraction. If
users want to use unsupported tools to modify their configuration do
we really want to be debugging those modifications as well as wine
issues?

Chris