Rob Shearman robertshearman@gmail.com writes:
2009/4/9 Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com:
(This was last discussed in February, e.g. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two sources of noise:
- 32 and 64 bit results are mixed together
- we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
Removing these two sources of noise might be as simple as
- omit 64 bit results, and
Not a bad idea, but I would suggest classifying these machines as a different category (I would suggest "other" for the moment) rather than omitting the results.
Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't think we want to split them.