On 1/31/22 11:50, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=106582
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
user32: win.c:9977: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 000301D4, expected 000202CE win.c:9984: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 000301D4, expected 000302B6 win.c:10068: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 000301D4, expected 000C0074 win.c:10076: Test failed: WindowFromPoint returned 000301D4, expected 000302B6 win.c:10005: Test failed: transparent window didn't get WM_NCHITTEST message win.c:10006: Test failed: button under static window didn't get WM_LBUTTONUP
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
user32: win.c:10578: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8 win.c:10582: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8 win.c:10586: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
user32: win.c:10578: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8 win.c:10582: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8 win.c:10586: Test failed: pos = 00c800c8
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
user32: win.c:10772: Test failed: Expected foreground window 00FF00C8, got 008400B4 win.c:10774: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:10774: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:10775: Test failed: Received WM_ACTIVATEAPP(1), did not expect it. win.c:10776: Test failed: Received WM_ACTIVATEAPP(0), did not expect it. win.c:10784: Test failed: Expected foreground window 00FF00C8, got 00000000 win.c:10786: Test failed: GetActiveWindow() = 00000000 win.c:10786: Test failed: GetFocus() = 00000000 win.c:10794: Test failed: Received WM_ACTIVATEAPP(1), did not expect it.
I think the patches help with some other failures such as pre-existing windows (like the firewall window problem after ntoskrnl.exe runs), but they apparently also add some flakiness. I'll resend without this one for now.