14 Dec
2011
14 Dec
'11
1:58 p.m.
On 14 December 2011 14:54, Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 December 2011 14:44, Michael Curran curran.michaelp@gmail.com wrote:
Just a quick check, since Debian had a big kerfuffle when someone went and initialized variables in a crypto module, but is there any chance that those variables were left uninitialized on purpose?
Except for some TRACEs, I don't think these are actually read.
And actually, that probably makes the patch wrong too. If those functions end up being called by an application you'd still be tracing uninitialized data, but Coverity just wouldn't notice.