Sorry for just jumping in here but that sounds good to me, at least that way we know that they are in the code.. One thing I may be able to do relatively soon is go thru and test apps that use those functions when they exist and uncomment them to see if it makes things better or worse, or if they just stay the same.
Not totally sure tho --- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr writes:
IMHO the more complete our spec files the better. Even if we just add stubs.
In many cases apps will check for a function existence and call it if it exists, so adding a stub can actually break things compared to not having the function at all. If you want to add all these stubs then I'd suggest commenting them out until they either get implemented, or we find an app that really needs the entry point.
-- Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.com
===== -- Dustin Navea
Minor Contributor, winehq.com Buzilla Janitor, bugs.winehq.com Network Admin, irc.blynk.net (down)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com