Re: [PATCH 1/4] riched20: Basic ITextDocument implementation for ITextServices (try 3)

[Alexandre Julliard]

Caibin Chen  writes:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> I think it make sense to have a separate file for ITextDocument. It
> will be used in txtsrv.c and richole.c (See patch 4). If it's WINE's
> convention to not have separate files for separate implementations, I
> can merge the txtrng.[ch] and txtsel.[ch] that introduced in patch 2
> and 3 into txtdoc.[ch]

It's already defined and used in richole.c. If at some point it becomes
too large it can be moved to a different file, but introducing a new
file and then removing that stuff from richole.c makes a mess of the
history.