Re: WLDAP32: link to the reentrant version of libldap

[Alexandre Julliard]

Hans Leidekker  writes:
> Yes, strictly speaking we should check all 4 reference handling
> functions that are absent from your libldap_r, but I'd rather keep
> the configure checks to an absolute minimum. Since these functions
> are related I doubt that there are versions of libldap_r around
> where less than 4 of them are missing. And when that happens we
> can deal with it ;-)

It's really not much more work to do it right the first time around,
and it makes the code much clearer. Otherwise it looks quite strange
to have #ifdefs for a function you aren't even calling.