On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 10:23 -0500, Dimi Paun wrote:
now it's fine. lprc->top is one-based that lead me to think that we shouldn't use lprc->top as the subItem identifier.
It's documented as the subItem identifier. Why not use it?
Sorry, I meant, not to use it in this special case. So if the number of columns is (only) 1, a lprc->top of 1 means call LISTVIEW_GetItemRect.
This smells like a test for the test-suite btw.
Paul.