Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
But this is besides the point. What I'm arguing against is using the long names internally. This makes little sense, since I am virtually sure nobody else will. So we will loose clarity, neatness, and convenience for the very purpose of uniformity with some Winelib apps, that's not going to be there in the first place since they are not gonna use the long names, and are going to invent their own anyhow.
Hmm. I don't see a problem with WINE_TRACE myself. It seems short enough, and the source code gets read a lot more often than it gets written, so the extra clarity is good. - Dan