2016-07-05 10:59 GMT-06:00 Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com:
On 05.07.2016 19:56, Alex Henrie wrote:
2016-07-05 10:54 GMT-06:00 Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com:
On 05.07.2016 18:46, Alex Henrie wrote:
2016-07-05 0:26 GMT-06:00 Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com:
On 05.07.2016 8:47, Alex Henrie wrote:
- if (0) /* crashes on all versions of Windows */
- {
r = FolderItems_get_Count(items, NULL);+todo_wine
ok(r == E_INVALIDARG, "expected E_INVALIDARG, got %08x\n", r);- }
Why do you want to handle this case if it crashes consistently on Windows? And todo_wine is not going to do anything in commented block obviously.
Good point. Would you like me to remove this code altogether, or just the todo_wine and ok statement? Also, would you like me to change the other if (0) blocks to if (GetVersion() > MAKELONG(5,1)) to avoid having todo_wine's in if (0) blocks?
If it crashes on some windows versions just put it in 'if (0)' with appropriate comment for documentation purposes, and a NULL check could be implemented. Version 5,1 means XP, right? if it does not crash since XP just make it a regular test, enabled unconditionally.
It crashes on XP, and I'm pretty sure that it's not OK to have tests that crash the XP testbot. I'll remove the todo_wine's though.
Ah, right, it was a greater-than check. So yes, if it only crashes on XP, and works on everything newer we should implement newer behavior and have disabled test that documents all that. No need for todo_wine.
And you don't want any if (0) blocks that crash on all versions of Windows, right?
-Alex