Dietrich Teickner wrote:
With one inline asm-statement this function would smaler and faster.
Nobody is really going to notice the difference this brings, almost no real code uses Rtl* functions (programs, not Windows dlls), and you're making a maintence problem by adding assembly code which depends on gcc/x86.
There's much better ways to optimize Wine. Macroscopic optimizations, such as strategically changing the order of a few functions could give us great performance benefit, and not introduce the code management problems that platform and compiler specific optimizations have.
Mike