The question is - who decides what? - and I'll explain...
I'm not sure that CodeWeavers have the same priorities as Transgaming. As much as I see now, Transgaming is very focused on multimedia (e.g: WineX 2) while CodeWeavers is more focused on productivity applications (e.g: CrossOver Office, the Kylix RAD GUI and other stuff)..
So I wonder - if every side see different parts in different priorities - who decides what-worth-what? just an hypothetical example: does ALSA driver worth DCOM implementation?
Maybe it's time that both Jeremy White and Gavriel State would say what parts of their side of wine (WineHQ VS. Re-Wind/WineX) they're willing to trade? I don't know if there is a need for a middle man here since both sides knows how to express themselves quite well (oh, and Brett - if you see this email and want to respond - SHUT UP!)..
Would either one of the side put down a list of what he's want to trade?
Thanks, Hetz