Today, we assert that a short write clears the FD_WRITE event bit; however, short writes can never happen on Windows in the first place. We're testing for a property of a socket behaviour that does not exist on Windows, but currently happens to be exhibited by Wine.
Ignore short writes, and continue sending until it fails with EWOULDBLOCK. This way, the test won't care whether or not a short write clears FD_WRITE. This allows us some flexibility in implementation of send().
Signed-off-by: Jinoh Kang jinoh.kang.kr@gmail.com ---
Notes: v4 -> v5: new patch
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c b/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c index 66bd5452046..b7d7ffc9646 100644 --- a/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c +++ b/dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c @@ -5660,14 +5660,11 @@ static void test_write_events(struct event_test_ctx *ctx)
if (!broken(1)) { - while ((ret = send(server, buffer, buffer_size, 0)) == buffer_size); /* Windows will never send less than buffer_size bytes here, but Linux * may do a short write. */ - todo_wine_if (ret > 0) - { - ok(ret == -1, "got %d\n", ret); - ok(WSAGetLastError() == WSAEWOULDBLOCK, "got error %u\n", WSAGetLastError()); - } + while ((ret = send(server, buffer, buffer_size, 0)) > 0); + ok(ret == -1, "got %d\n", ret); + ok(WSAGetLastError() == WSAEWOULDBLOCK, "got error %u\n", WSAGetLastError());
while (recv(client, buffer, buffer_size, 0) > 0); ok(WSAGetLastError() == WSAEWOULDBLOCK, "got error %u\n", WSAGetLastError());