9 Jul
2004
9 Jul
'04
8:13 p.m.
Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de writes:
Doesn't it sound like it's wrong for ntdll _vsnwprintf() to rely on a restricted implementation for snprintfW()?
No, since we provide snprintfW ourselves we can decide how it should behave. We could of course have two different implementations but that doesn't really seem necessary.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org