On 24 November 2013 23:45, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesinger@gmail.com wrote:
Am 2013-11-24 11:30, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
Is there a good reason this can't just be fixed first?
It's certainly possible, but it comes with a greater risk of regressions and I estimate that it will require a week of duplicated
That shouldn't be true, I think.
work. The current surface location management will go away and I prefer to migrate to the volume-style location management at the lowest possible complexity instead of spending time fixing the old code first.
I'm not quite sure what you mean here, the volume and surface resource location management functions should be pretty much the same. The exceptions to that are of course things like PBOs and perhaps DCs, but fixing that is pretty much what this is about. I think it's also worth pointing out that the way the volume code uses PBOs isn't a whole lot better than what the surface code does.