Re: winemaker problem

[Hans Christian Studt]

Jeff Smith wrote:
> Yes there should be.  Currently execname.so is being created rather than
> execname.exe.so.  The patch I submitted a few hours ago (don't know
> if it has made it through yet) includes a fix for this.
>
> Copying the file is actually what I did for several weeks, rather than
> dig in to winemaker to fix the problem.  But I get fed up and started
> putting together a patch for this several days ago.  So now it is ready
> to roll.  Good timing, yes?

Thanks Jeff, Sylvain and Shachar - now I am rolling :-)

I will look into how to compile out of the CVS later.