If this is correct and works I have no objection to reverting my old patch
Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart aric@codeweavers.com
On 4/16/18 7:30 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
This patch reverts commit 304ff3c7280a53b7cbadfa83eaeda458ff5959d1, and fixes multiple regressions caused by this change for non-US keyboards.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru
dlls/dinput/keyboard.c | 24 ++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/dinput/keyboard.c b/dlls/dinput/keyboard.c index 4c3c38e7fc..e1ba15edd1 100644 --- a/dlls/dinput/keyboard.c +++ b/dlls/dinput/keyboard.c @@ -69,26 +69,10 @@ static inline IDirectInputDevice8W *IDirectInputDevice8W_from_impl(SysKeyboardIm
static BYTE map_dik_code(DWORD scanCode, DWORD vkCode) {
- static const BYTE asciiCodes[] =
{/*32*/ DIK_SPACE,0,0,0,0,0,0,DIK_APOSTROPHE,/*40*/ 0,0,0,0,DIK_COMMA,DIK_MINUS,DIK_PERIOD,DIK_SLASH,/*48*/ DIK_0,DIK_1,DIK_2,DIK_3,DIK_4,DIK_5,DIK_6,DIK_7,/*56*/ DIK_8,DIK_9,DIK_COLON,DIK_SEMICOLON,0,DIK_EQUALS,0,0,/*64*/ DIK_AT,DIK_A,DIK_B,DIK_C,DIK_D,DIK_E,DIK_F,DIK_G,/*72*/ DIK_H,DIK_I,DIK_J,DIK_K,DIK_L,DIK_M,DIK_N,DIK_O,/*80*/ DIK_P,DIK_Q,DIK_R,DIK_S,DIK_T,DIK_U,DIK_V,DIK_W,/*88*/ DIK_X,DIK_Y,DIK_Z,DIK_LBRACKET,0,DIK_RBRACKET,DIK_CIRCUMFLEX,DIK_UNDERLINE} /*95*/ ;- BYTE out_code = 0;
- WCHAR c = MapVirtualKeyW(vkCode,MAPVK_VK_TO_CHAR);
- if (c > 31 && c < 96)
out_code = asciiCodes[c - 32];- if (out_code == 0)
out_code = scanCode;- return out_code;
if (!scanCode)
scanCode = MapVirtualKeyW(vkCode, MAPVK_VK_TO_VSC);return scanCode; }
static int KeyboardCallback( LPDIRECTINPUTDEVICE8A iface, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam )